Business Carve-out for a Financial Services Company With a Strong Global Footprint
The Challenge
Our clientâs IT organization was facing a tough schedule of less than nine months to divide up its global IT architecture and operating model. Making the carve-out even more challenging was limited transparency across the 1,000+ systems that made up their global architecture. Getting the separation right was critical as not only did the new and old businesses need to be operational in time for âDay 1â, it all had to happen without disrupting day-to-day operations.
â
â
The Approach
Through a process of workshops, assessments, and automated tooling, our BCG team created a global app and infrastructure landscape, as a baseline to ensure transparency for the future of the project. Next, we set a target picture, defining Day 1 critical apps for new business to operate. The BCG Platinion team ruthlessly de-prioritized the âlong tailâ of non-critical apps to ensure Day 1 was viable and achievable. Transition services, frameworks and agreements were set up for high-risk applications that could not be separated in time for Day 1. We also initiated the program management office and project execution support services (templates, tracking, processes, vendor management) that were essential to enable timely client delivery. Delivery involved a unique âone stop shopâ service: Program management rigor combined with architecture advisory to ensure on time and high quality delivery of the IT separation program.
â
The Impact
- An activist PMO function brought clarity to a complex delivery environment.
- Legal frameworks were put in place to cleanly carve-out the old and new technology organisations and ensure a seamless Day 1 separation.
- Prioritized on-time separation delivered a measurable increase in shareholder value through more effective and specialist entities.
â
Looking Into the Future
On time separation enabled an increase in shareholder value as the Old Business and the New Business were able to separate into more effective and specialized entities in line with the broader business strategy.
â
â
More to Explore
Enabling the e-Mobility Evolution in Energy
In 2021, the EU Commission presented the Fit for 55 proposal. This ambitious, comprehensive set of climate policies has been compiled to ensure that a 55% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions is achieved by 2030. The EU successfully reached agreements on the proposalâs key policies, including the goal that only zero-emission cars will be sold from 2035 onwards. Meeting the 55% GHG reduction target will be a crucial milestone on the journey to achieving Net Zero by 2050, and organisations are eager to maintain momentum. Recognising the challenging nature of these targets, a multinational utility company that offers B2B and public charging services faced a key question. The organisation wanted to understand whether its proprietary B2B charging platform would be able to scale to handle the anticipated increase in B2C charging customers.
Teaming Up For Disaster Mitigation
Everybody is feeling the impact of climate change on the environment â for instance, in the form of dramatic natural disasters in areas that were previously rarely affected. As such, a catastrophic natural disaster in the heart of a Europe has severe consequences, including loss of lives and livelihood. BCG and BCG Platinion were immediately on hand to enhance resilience in a European region hit by the worst catastrophe in its recent history. The team worked with passion and deliberation to develop a sustainable and resilient concept to better deal with similar situations in the future.
The Core & Beyond - A Tailor-Made Transformation
Replacing or keeping the legacy Core Banking System (CBS) is one of the most fundamental decisions for a financial institution to make. This strategic bet should be carefully evaluated, with three key aspects in mind: a clear view on the entire IT platform (wider than legacy CBS and its constraints), a strategic vision set within a specific time horizon, and the return on investment. For organizations with a burning platform, CBS replacement may be a necessity, but in many cases the real investment potential is located elsewhere â in areas such as data platforms, integration layers, portals, or process engines. This alternative approach leads to numerous non-trivial questions: Where does the value come from? Is legacy the real issue? Which areas to reinforce and in which order?
